Reasoning - Revision history

Wikiadmin at 15:43, 7 March 2022

2022-03-07T15:43:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:43, 7 March 2022
Line 12:		Line 12:
	The teacher/tutor and student should focus on deep conceptual models and explanations rather than superficial facts.<ref>Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one‐to‐one tutoring. Applied cognitive psychology, 9(6), 495-522.‏</ref>		The teacher/tutor and student should focus on deep conceptual models and explanations rather than superficial facts.<ref>Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one‐to‐one tutoring. Applied cognitive psychology, 9(6), 495-522.‏</ref>
	-->		-->


	<h2>Inductive reasoning</h2>		<h2>Inductive reasoning</h2>
	Inductive reasoning “bottom-up logic” is the reverse process of reasoning from a single observation or instance to a probable explanation or generalization.<ref name="wang2019designing"/>		Inductive reasoning “bottom-up logic” is the reverse process of reasoning from a single observation or instance to a probable explanation or generalization.<ref name="wang2019designing"/>



	==Notes==		==Notes==
	<references />		<references />

Wikiadmin at 15:32, 7 March 2022

2022-03-07T15:32:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:32, 7 March 2022
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Deductive reasoning “top-down logic” is the process of reasoning from premises to a conclusion.<ref name="wang2019designing"/>		Deductive reasoning “top-down logic” is the process of reasoning from premises to a conclusion.<ref name="wang2019designing"/>

			<!--
	<h2>Deep explanatory reasoning</h2>		<h2>Deep explanatory reasoning</h2>
	The teacher/tutor and student should focus on deep conceptual models and explanations rather than superficial facts.<ref>Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one‐to‐one tutoring. Applied cognitive psychology, 9(6), 495-522.‏</ref>		The teacher/tutor and student should focus on deep conceptual models and explanations rather than superficial facts.<ref>Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one‐to‐one tutoring. Applied cognitive psychology, 9(6), 495-522.‏</ref>
			-->


	<h2>Inductive reasoning</h2>		<h2>Inductive reasoning</h2>
	Inductive reasoning “bottom-up logic” is the reverse process of reasoning from a single observation or instance to a probable explanation or generalization.<ref name="wang2019designing"/>		Inductive reasoning “bottom-up logic” is the reverse process of reasoning from a single observation or instance to a probable explanation or generalization.<ref name="wang2019designing"/>

Wikiadmin: Protected "Reasoning" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) [cascading]

2022-03-02T14:32:27Z

Protected "Reasoning" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) [cascading]

← Older revision

Revision as of 14:32, 2 March 2022

Wikiadmin at 18:14, 20 February 2022

2022-02-20T18:14:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 20 February 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<h2>Abductive reasoning</h2>		<h2>Abductive reasoning</h2>
	Abductive reasoning is the reverse of deductive reasoning and reasons from an observation to the most likely explanation. This is also known as “inference to the best explanation”. It is more selective than inductive reasoning, since it prioritizes hypotheses. <ref name="wang2019designing">Wang, D., Yang, Q., Abdul, A., & Lim, B. Y. (2019, May). Designing theory-driven user-centric explainable AI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-15).‏</ref>		"Abductive reasoning is the reverse of deductive reasoning and reasons from an observation to the most likely explanation. This is also known as “inference to the best explanation”. It is more selective than inductive reasoning, since it prioritizes hypotheses." <ref name="wang2019designing">Wang, D., Yang, Q., Abdul, A., & Lim, B. Y. (2019, May). Designing theory-driven user-centric explainable AI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-15).‏</ref>


	<h2>Analogical reasoning</h2>		<h2>Analogical reasoning</h2>
	"~~Argument from analogy~~ is a ~~special type~~ of ~~inductive argument~~, ~~whereby perceived similarities are used as~~ a ~~basis to infer some further similarity that has yet to~~ be ~~observed. Analogical reasoning~~ is one ~~of the most common methods by which human beings attempt~~ to ~~understand~~ the ~~world and make decisions~~. ~~When a person has a bad experience with a product and decides not to buy anything further from the producer~~, ~~this is often a case of analogical reasoning~~. ~~It is also implicit in much of science; for instance~~, ~~experiments on laboratory rats typically proceed on the basis that some physiological similarities between rats and humans entails some further similarity~~ (e.g. ~~possible reactions to a drug~~).~~" <ref>https~~:/~~/en.wikipedia~~.~~org/wiki/Argument_from_analogy~~</ref>		"Analogical reasoning is a kind of reasoning that is based on finding a common relational system between two situations, exemplars, or domains. When such a common system can be found, then what is known about one situation can be used to infer new information about the other." <ref>Gentner, D., & Smith, L. (2012). Analogical Reasoning. In V. S. Ramachandran (Red), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (Second Edition) (Second Edition, bll 130–136). doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-375000-6.00022-7</ref>

	<h2>Deductive reasoning</h2>		<h2>Deductive reasoning</h2>
Line 10:		Line 9:

	<h2>Deep explanatory reasoning</h2>		<h2>Deep explanatory reasoning</h2>
	The teacher/tutor and student should focus on deep conceptual models and explanations rather than superficial facts.		The teacher/tutor and student should focus on deep conceptual models and explanations rather than superficial facts.<ref>Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one‐to‐one tutoring. Applied cognitive psychology, 9(6), 495-522.‏</ref>

	<h2>Inductive reasoning</h2>		<h2>Inductive reasoning</h2>
	Inductive reasoning “bottom-up logic” is the reverse process of reasoning from a single observation or instance to a probable explanation or generalization.		Inductive reasoning “bottom-up logic” is the reverse process of reasoning from a single observation or instance to a probable explanation or generalization.<ref name="wang2019designing"/>

	==Notes==		==Notes==
	<references />		<references />

Wikiadmin at 14:10, 20 February 2022

2022-02-20T14:10:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:10, 20 February 2022
Line 14:		Line 14:
	<h2>Inductive reasoning</h2>		<h2>Inductive reasoning</h2>
	Inductive reasoning “bottom-up logic” is the reverse process of reasoning from a single observation or instance to a probable explanation or generalization.		Inductive reasoning “bottom-up logic” is the reverse process of reasoning from a single observation or instance to a probable explanation or generalization.

			==Notes==
			<references />

Wikiadmin at 23:45, 18 February 2022

2022-02-18T23:45:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:45, 18 February 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<h2>Abductive reasoning</h2>		<h2>Abductive reasoning</h2>
	Abductive reasoning is the reverse of deductive reasoning and reasons from an observation to the most likely explanation. This is also known as “inference to the best explanation”. It is more selective than inductive reasoning, since it prioritizes hypotheses.		Abductive reasoning is the reverse of deductive reasoning and reasons from an observation to the most likely explanation. This is also known as “inference to the best explanation”. It is more selective than inductive reasoning, since it prioritizes hypotheses. <ref name="wang2019designing">Wang, D., Yang, Q., Abdul, A., & Lim, B. Y. (2019, May). Designing theory-driven user-centric explainable AI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-15).‏</ref>


	<h2>Analogical reasoning</h2>		<h2>Analogical reasoning</h2>
	Argument from analogy is a special type of inductive argument, whereby perceived similarities are used as a basis to infer some further similarity that has yet to be observed. Analogical reasoning is one of the most common methods by which human beings attempt to understand the world and make decisions. When a person has a bad experience with a product and decides not to buy anything further from the producer, this is often a case of analogical reasoning. It is also implicit in much of science; for instance, experiments on laboratory rats typically proceed on the basis that some physiological similarities between rats and humans entails some further similarity (e.g. possible reactions to a drug).		"Argument from analogy is a special type of inductive argument, whereby perceived similarities are used as a basis to infer some further similarity that has yet to be observed. Analogical reasoning is one of the most common methods by which human beings attempt to understand the world and make decisions. When a person has a bad experience with a product and decides not to buy anything further from the producer, this is often a case of analogical reasoning. It is also implicit in much of science; for instance, experiments on laboratory rats typically proceed on the basis that some physiological similarities between rats and humans entails some further similarity (e.g. possible reactions to a drug)." <ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_analogy</ref>

	<h2>Deductive reasoning</h2>		<h2>Deductive reasoning</h2>
	Deductive reasoning “top-down logic” is the process of reasoning from premises to a conclusion.		Deductive reasoning “top-down logic” is the process of reasoning from premises to a conclusion.<ref name="wang2019designing"/>

	<h2>Deep explanatory reasoning</h2>		<h2>Deep explanatory reasoning</h2>

Wikiadmin: Created page with "

Abductive reasoning

Abductive reasoning is the reverse of deductive reasoning and reasons from an observation to the most likely explanation. This is also known as..."

2021-12-19T13:39:02Z

Created page with "<h2>Abductive reasoning</h2> Abductive reasoning is the reverse of deductive reasoning and reasons from an observation to the most likely explanation. This is also known as..."

New page

<h2>Abductive reasoning</h2>
Abductive reasoning is the reverse of deductive reasoning and reasons from an observation to the most likely explanation. This is also known as “inference to the best explanation”. It is more selective than inductive reasoning, since it prioritizes hypotheses.

<h2>Analogical reasoning</h2>
Argument from analogy is a special type of inductive argument, whereby perceived similarities are used as a basis to infer some further similarity that has yet to be observed. Analogical reasoning is one of the most common methods by which human beings attempt to understand the world and make decisions. When a person has a bad experience with a product and decides not to buy anything further from the producer, this is often a case of analogical reasoning. It is also implicit in much of science; for instance, experiments on laboratory rats typically proceed on the basis that some physiological similarities between rats and humans entails some further similarity (e.g. possible reactions to a drug).

<h2>Deductive reasoning</h2>
Deductive reasoning “top-down logic” is the process of reasoning from premises to a conclusion.

<h2>Deep explanatory reasoning</h2>
The teacher/tutor and student should focus on deep conceptual models and explanations rather than superficial facts.

<h2>Inductive reasoning</h2>
Inductive reasoning “bottom-up logic” is the reverse process of reasoning from a single observation or instance to a probable explanation or generalization.